Latest Entries »

A Darker Shade of Green

Toxic Turbines

Every industrial scale wind turbine uses about 2,000 kg of rare earth metals. The western world no longer mines rare earths due to the amount of pollution involved. In China, where most of the rare earths are mined, water and farmlands are contaminated; people are getting sick and dying from diseases and cancers caused by vast lakes of acidic wastewater, heavy metal contamination and radioactive tailings of uranium and thorium.

‘There’s not one step of the rare earth mining process that is not disastrous for the environment… we have the responsibility to recognize the environmental destruction that is being caused while making these wind turbines.’ – Jamie Choi, Head of Toxics Campaign at Greenpeace China.

Farmers and other rural folks in China (and Malaysia) are having their lands destroyed, their water poisoned and their health ruined.

We’re destroying their environment to save ours?

In China, the true cost of Britain’s clean, green wind power experiment: Pollution on a disastrous scale:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1350811/In-China-true-cost-Britains-clean-green-wind-power-experiment-Pollution-disastrous-scale.html

Pollution the big barrier to freer trade in rare earths:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/19/us-china-rareearth-idUSBRE82I08I20120319

Battered Bats (and more chemicals)

With over one million bats having succumbed to white-nose syndrome in the north-eastern US and Ontario, bat populations are further threatened by industrial wind plants. Thousands die every year as their tiny lungs explode when they get too close to the rotating blades. Fewer bats result in more pesticide use as the bats eat the insects which plague farmers.

http://www.batsandwind.org/default.asp

Beaten Birds

About a half million birds are killed by industrial scale wind turbines every year.

“Safeguards are needed to prevent population declines in the Whooping Crane and Greater Sage-Grouse, and reduce mass mortality among eagles and songbirds” – Wind Development Threatens Iconic American Birds, American Bird Conservancy

Cats also kill birds, but they don’t kill eagles, hawks, swans, herons, cranes, and vultures.

http://www.abcbirds.org/abcprograms/policy/collisions/wind_farms.html

Loss of Human Health

People living near industrial scale wind turbines experience:

  • sleep
  • disturbances
  • headaches
  • dizziness
  • nausea
  • tinnitus
  • irritability
  • exhaustion

http://www.windvigilance.com/about-adverse-health-effects

Loss of Human Habitat

People living near industrial scale wind turbines have been driven from their homes due to health complaints. In some cases, the companies have bought the homes from the victims but deny any links to health complaints by placing gags on the sales.

Ripley Wind Project company buys out four homes:

http://www.kincardinenews.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=3101991&archive=true

Expropriation without Compensation

Owning a home is not like playing in the stock market. Some people have put all of their life savings into paying off and improving their homes only to find the value of their property reduced by 40% when the wind companies come to town.

Wind turbines blow down resale value of homes: Pedlar http://www.sarniathisweek.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=3485334

Corporate Mockery of Green Energy

The first thing a person buys when going off the grid is not a wind turbine; it’s a battery bank. Electricity is consumed from the battery bank; the turbine is there to charge it.

Wind plants do not charge battery banks or any other storage medium. The amount of energy generated varies with wind speed so it must be paired with generation which can be modulated to match the grid. New natural gas plants are being built to be paired with new industrial wind plants.

This increases our dependency on fossil fuels:

http://downwindontario.wordpress.com/2012/01/29/too-much-of-a-good-thing/

.

What the Frack?

Natural gas – as natural as coal, mercury or arsenic. Some folks get confused by the nomenclature of “natural” gas. In this case the word natural means that it occurs naturally; i.e., not man-made. It is not a renewable resource. Like coal, natural gas is a fossil fuel which contributes to global warming, climate change, acid rain, ground level ozone and causes respiratory illnesses and death.

Advocates of natural gas refer to it as a “bridging” fuel to a renewable energy future since natural gas burns cleaner than coal or oil. In reality this is a bridge to nowhere in terms of the environment, especially when one takes hydraulic fracturing into consideration.Image

As conventional methods of natural gas extraction declines due to resource depletion, a new method has developed. Hydraulic fracturing or “fracking” is used used to tap into sources of gas previously unattainable. The process involves injecting a mixture of water, sand and chemicals into the ground to break up – fracture – shale deposits releasing the entrapped natural gas. Millions of litres of fresh drinking water are lost forever, wells and aquifers become contaminated and earthquakes also result.

Pavillion, Wyoming is one such town affected by fracking. Last December, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency pointed to fracking as the likely cause of dangerous levels of benzene – a carcinogen – in the town’s drinking water. A fracking company has admitted to causing about 50 tremors in England’s Blackpool area. Geologists have blamed fracking for 11 earthquakes in Ohio. A 4.0 magnitude quake could be felt as far as Hamilton.

Ontario is not immune to this new industrial development. Hundreds (thousands?) of acres have already been leased. A test site is being developed in Chatham Kent. Potential deposits of shale gas covers all of south-western Ontario and parts of eastern Ontario as well. Up to one hundred times the number of well pads are required for fracking compared to conventional extraction methods. Picture a fracking site every 2.5 square kilometers with all of the necessary pipelines and roadways.

Some groups opposed to fracking erroneously praise the current government’s development of industrial wind plants as an alternative to natural gas.  Unfortunately, natural gas and industrial wind energy go hand in hand. Anyone that has gone off the grid knows that the first item to buy is a battery bank. Wind turbines and solar panels are what charge the battery bank – that’s renewable energy. By not storing the energy generated by wind, gas plants are required to pair with the industrial scale wind plants to synchronize wind output with grid demand – that’s not renewable energy. That’s a corporate scam.

  • Total Ontario electricity exports for 2011 – 9000MW

  •  Net revenue on electricity exports for 2011 – $277 million

  • Total coal plant generation for 2011 – 4100MW

The provincial government keeps telling us that we need to shut down the dirty coal plants. So why don’t they? The impression they have left with the general public is that we need to blanket Ontario with wind turbines before we can shut them down. There is no need to wait, especially when we are needlessly exporting dirty coal electricity at the expense of the environment and peoples’ health. Even without coal generation, Ontario currently has over 10,000MW of capacity above peak electrical demands. Considering the current rate of climate change, it is mind-boggling that coal plants are still running at all.

However, if there were no more coal plants, the next logical step in climate change mitigation would be to continue the phase-out of all fossil fuelled generation. Next on the list are gas plants, but by embarking on an aggressive program of wind development (up to 8,000MW) which neglects the need for storage capacity, we cannot phase out gas plants. Indeed, this is the reason the government has plans to build more gas plants: to pair with planned wind developments.

Please read the previous post to understand the relationship between wind and gas when storage capacity is neglected from the development of renewable energies such as wind and solar.

Too much of a good thing?

How renewable energy can go from hero to zero
A rudimentary understanding of the Ontario electrical grid and how renewable energy such as wind and solar works, quickly leads one to the conclusion that too much wind and solar energy negates the ability of the grid to rid itself of fossil fuels.
The grid is really just a bunch of wires that connect you to an electrical generator. 
A “blackout” occurs when the grid can no longer supply people with electricity due to faults in the system or acts of nature like storms or high winds. When this happens, many people use small gas generators for backup power. The generator matches the amount of power used. The more electricity used the more tanks of gas used by the generator. In effect, the generator and the wires connected to household appliances - the load - serves as one's own "mini" grid. However, if too much electricity is used, the generator can't keep up and - depending on the type of generator - either appliances will be damaged or a "mini blackout" will occur. To avoid these problems cooking a meal might start with turning the hot water heater off to ensure the stove doesn’t overload the generator.
When people decide to "get off the grid" to generate their own electricity using renewable energy such as solar panels or a wind turbine, in effect, they create a miniature grid. Electricity is supplied by a battery bank charged by solar panels or a wind turbine. Since it is impossible to continuously match the amount of power used in a home with how fast the wind is blowing or how much the sun is shining, a battery bank is required to store the electricity that is generated. Again, if too much electricity is used and the battery is drained of its charge, another "mini blackout" will occur. On the other hand, if the battery bank is fully charged and the sun is still shining or the wind is still blowing, a "dump load" is required to divert the excess energy to a large resistor. This prevents the destruction of the battery bank or prevent the wind turbine from spinning wildly out of control. 
With any grid someone needs to play the role of the grid operator ensuring that the electricity demanded by appliances match what can be supplied by the generator or battery bank to avoid a blackout. A true grid operator has a much bigger job: matching every nuclear, coal, gas and hydropower plant with every factory, mall, hospital, street light, TV and toaster in the province. The challenge is greater, but the basic concepts are the same.
Across any one province, a certain amount of electricity is used all of the time for heating in the winter, cooling in the summer, by hot water tanks, fridges, freezers, office lighting, computers, hospitals, factories running 24 hours, etc. This base amount of electricity used all of the time is called "base-load". Although more electricity is generally required during the day, there is a point during the night, when little activity is going on, that sets a base point for the minimum amount of electricity that gets used continuously. The current base-load in the province of Ontario is about 13,000MW of electricity and represents about two-thirds of the total of all electricity used. Generators that are meant to run all of the time such as nuclear and certain hydropower plants supply base-load.
At the start of a typical weekday, people wake up, shower, cook breakfast... increasing the amount of electricity used. As the day progresses, factories are humming, classrooms and offices are filled … more and more electricity is being used. After a small lull after noon, by suppertime, all of the stoves, TVs, computers, lights, stereos and other appliances that are being used reach a peak (currently 19,000MW) of electricity consumption known as peak-load. As night falls and people go to bed, energy use then tapers off again.
As the demand for electricity rises and falls during the day, it needs to be paired with something much more flexible than nuclear power. Flexible sources such as coal plants, gas plants and hydro-electric dams can all be controlled to meet the demand for electricity during these peaking hours. A number of these fossil (coal and gas) generators will be running but not actually supplying the grid. This insurance is in place in the event that a large generator (such as a nuclear or another large fossil plant) suddenly shuts down or goes off line.
In order to match generation to consumption in real time, some generators must fluctuate up and down constantly. Gas plants known as “peaker-plants” are used this way, but must be running at more than 70% full power in order to achieve the amount of flexibility required. Alternatively, hydro-electric dams can adjust their output quickly by just changing how much water flows across the generator. In general, water is allowed to build up in reservoirs behind the dam at night time when its electrical output is not needed, then used for peak use and fine tuning the grid during the day. Like a battery bank used for home generation, electricity can be stored for later use. However, the amount of hydro-electricity currently available to us that can be used in this fashion is limited and affected by the seasons, so gas plants are still required. 
How does wind and solar fit in? 
For home power supply, either a gas generator must continuously run or electricity from a battery bank (charged by a wind turbine or solar panel) is required to keep the lights on and appliances running. A home gas generator can also be ‘paired’ with a wind turbine or solar panels. This pairing marries the fossil fuels used by the gas generator to the renewable energy of wind and solar. In other words, the gas generator runs continuously, supplemented by solar or wind.
If the gas generator is ‘solar paired’, it will utilize gas the least during the day when the sun is shining and the most at night when the sun goes down. If the gas generator is ‘wind paired’, its output will vary as the wind fluctuates. When it's windy, more electricity will be generated by the wind turbine with the remaining load matched by the gas generator. As wind speed drops, more of the electricity being used by the home-owner will be generated by the gas generator. The best the generator can produce through wind power is about 30% of its potential output (due to wind speed variations). Therefore, 70% of the electricity supplied by a wind-paired generator comes from gas.
Care must be taken by the operator as damage can occur or blackouts result if the electricity generated by the wind turbine or solar panels exceeds the amount of electricity being used. This example does little to reduce carbon emissions and there is no reduction in fossil fuel dependency. The gas generator must be kept running. People interested in renewable energy for home generation want to get the most out of their wind turbine or solar panels thus opt for the battery bank. 
Unfortunately, it is the pairing of renewable energy to fossil fuels that is employed across the wider grid of Ontario and many other jurisdictions. Denmark can store their wind energy by exporting excess wind generation to Norway (and Sweden to a lesser extent). Norway, which derives nearly all of its energy from hydropower, allows the reservoirs behind their dams to swell as they use the wind power from Denmark. When the wind drops off or when Denmark needs their energy back, Norway allows the water built up behind their dams to flow over the generators and export the energy back to Denmark. Alternatively, jurisdictions such as California can use excess wind energy to pump water to the top of a mountain lake. When the energy is needed, water is allowed to flow back down through a generator. By contrast, however, the province of Ontario has married its renewable energy from wind and solar to fossil fuels. 
Ontario already produces up to 75% of its electricity free of carbon emissions through nuclear and hydropower. This leaves little room for the ability to displace fossil fuels. The elimination of coal, which once provided both base-load and peaking power, is near completion. Its current output is minimal. As the amount of wind generation increases to the 8,000MW planned by the provincial government, plus increased output from solar generation, the ability to store renewable energy by existing hydropower plants has been greatly exceeded. By default, gas generators are used to pair with renewable energy. 
As noted above, some fossil generators are kept running for the unforeseen event of a large generator shutting down. Likewise, additional fossil plants must be kept running in the event of a sudden loss of wind or solar energy, further hampering any reduction of carbon emissions. By not utilizing a storage medium, charged by wind and solar, the province of Ontario could see the ultimate in ironies when it comes to climate change mitigation: an increase in carbon emissions caused by the renewable/fossil energy combination displacing existing carbon free generation.
At the current 1400MW of installed capacity of wind generation, Ontario has already had to pay its neighbours to take excess generation off of its hands, forced dams to "spill" water bypassing their generators and have nuclear units temporarily shutdown. It takes 2 days for a nuclear unit to restart. Increasing wind outlput to 8000MW will only escalate this problem. One can easily imagine the impact of a night when demand for electricity is low and the output from wind energy is high. What does the grid operator do with 8,000MW of wind energy that isn't needed? Wind plant owners are paid more than triple the actual price of electricity and get paid whether they supply the grid or are forced off-line so it makes sense to keep them running. However, additional fossil generators must be kept running to pick up the demand as wind speed drops and while the system waits for the nuclear units to come back on thus increasing carbon dioxide emissions. 
No responsible homeowner would omit a battery bank when planning to generate electricity with renewable energy. If we are serious about reducing fossil fuel consumption and dependency a solution to storing existing and future renewable energy must first be found and implemented before forging ahead with any further renewable energy developments.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.